🔗 Share this article

An activist group has stated to have harvested a vast number of songs from Spotify and is getting ready to publish them publicly.

Possible Impetus for AI Training

Industry experts said the apparent data breach could boost AI companies looking for material to develop their technology.

An entity called Anna’s Archive reported it had obtained 86 million audio tracks from Spotify and 256 million entries of associated data such as artist and record names. The company, which hosts more than 100 million tracks, confirmed that the leak did not constitute its entire catalog.

“We have identified and disabled the nefarious user accounts that were involved in illegal scraping,” said a company spokesperson.

The Swedish service, which has more than 700 million subscribers worldwide, added that an investigation into unauthorised access identified a external actor collected public metadata and employed questionable methods to circumvent DRM protections.

Archive's Stated Goal and Concerns

The streaming service does not believe the audio acquired by Anna’s Archive has been made public yet. Anna’s Archive, which is recognized for offering links to copyright-infringing books, wrote in a blog it wanted to create a ‘preservation archive’ for music.

They asserted the audio files accounted for 99.6% of all music streamed to by Spotify users and would be distributed via ‘torrents’, a method of sharing large data files online.

“Of course the service doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a great start,” said Anna’s Archive, which frames its mission as “preserving humanity’s information and culture”.

Model Development and Intellectual Property Debate

Ed Newton-Rex for defending artists’ copyright, said the leaked music would likely be utilized for developing AI models.

“Educating models on pirated material is unfortunately common in the tech sector, so this stolen music is almost certain to end up instructing AI models,” he said.

The Anna’s Archive site makes references to LibGen, a huge online archive of copyrighted books that has reportedly been used by the parent company of Facebook to train its systems.

The co-founder of an artificial intelligence company posted on LinkedIn that members of the public could in principle “build their own personal free equivalent of the service”. The executive said it could also allow technology firms to “educate models on contemporary music at a large volume”.

Intellectual property law has become a key issue between creatives, writers and content creators on one side and tech giants on the other.

Government Proposals and Reactions

In the UK, artists and writers have protested against a ministerial proposal to allow AI companies use protected work without permission unless the rights holder signals. Virtually every participant to a government call for evidence on the idea has backed artists’ apprehensions.

A government minister for technology, research and development informed parliament this month there was “little consensus” on the issue, adding that ministers would “use the time to get this right”. The administration has pledged to make regulatory plans on AI and copyright by next year.